Yesterday I
was watching Celebrity Masterchef. In
one section of the programme one of the chef presenters made a dish. It involved lots of sugar, figs and pastry. There was also a side garnish of cream with
orange and rose water, with pieces of praline, and some of the praline crushed
to dust to sprinkle over everything.
The contestants were given a pen and a bit of
paper and asked to identify the ingredients that went to make up the dish. They tasted all the bits and pieces and wrote
down their notes. They were then asked to recreate the dish. There was no list of ingredients or
recipe.
They were
given all the ingredients that had been used along with some ingredients that
hadn’t been used. It was up to them to
work out what they needed to do from seeing and tasting the end result.
Some of the
celebrities got down to rolling out the pastry and baking the pastry case
blind. Some began stewing the figs. The praline didn’t seem to bother any of them
– they knew what to do. One man just
looked at the plate of ingredients and had no idea what to do with any of the
stuff. An hour later they presented
their offerings to the presenter to be tasted and commented on.
Only one of
the celebrities had come close to doing the pastry tart properly. It was an up-side down tart. The filling went in first, the figs uncooked
resting on the boiled sugar stuff and with the pastry placed on top. Once cooked it was turned upside down. Cooked that way the pastry didn’t go
soggy. The woman had also added in
things that were not in the original recipe.
I think it as cardamom pods. She
was congratulated on the taste of her pie and the presenter said that he would
now start adding cardamom pods to his tarts.
There were
perfectly edible tarts all of them. For
the most part the pastry was soggy – but the figs were cooked well. The wrong piping bag had been used on the
cream or the sugar missed out somewhere – but the end result was not bad. There were variations in the tarts, the cream
and praline.
Imagine, if
you will, all the accounts of the way Christians did church that are
written about in the New Testament, in Paul’s letters. None of those churches are the finished
product – but let’s assume that it is like the presenter’s finished tart with
the garnishes.
Reading about
those churches and the relationships between church members – if you could “taste”
the tart, what would be the ingredients that could be identified? For example there might be a healthy sprinkle
of generosity. The book of Acts talks
about people selling land and giving to proceeds to the apostles to distribute
to the poor.
Imagine that
the next step is recreate the church in all its activities and
relationships. There is no recipe
included, just a whole lot of ingredients.
There is a huge selection of ingredients. You do the best to recreate what you have
read and meditated upon.
Imagine that
you present your “church” to the presenter.
Sometimes you come close to doing some part of the dish properly. Sometimes you miss an ingredient out – like the
sugar in the cream. Sometimes you add
something that wasn’t there originally – like the cardamom pod – and it
actually enhances the taste. Sometimes
you end up with the soggy bottom.
Sometimes that’s
what church is all about. It’s about
tasting what is in the Bible. It’s about
bringing to mind those good church experiences and trying to identify the
ingredients that made it good. Or the
not so good ones and trying to work out what went wrong. It’s about being prepared to risk the
cardamom pods in the mixture to see what happens.
If churches
were made like that I think they would be interesting places to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment